← back
Illustrative demo — synthetic sample data, no real patient data

Clinical research pipeline

Outcome data unified from paper forms, spreadsheets, and a legacy database — with the missing-data and cohort-tracking discipline the original process couldn't enforce.

Records unified
4,812
Follow-up complete
91%
Conflicts flagged
23
Source reconciliation
SourceRecordsFormatStatus
Intake forms (scanned)›1,940OCR + manual reviewReconciled
1,940 forms run through OCR — 2.1% flagged low-confidence and routed to manual review before entering the pipeline.
Follow-up tracker›2,105SpreadsheetReconciled
Owned by the clinical coordinator, updated daily — ingested and validated against patient IDs on every sync, not just at import.
Legacy database767FileMaker export23 conflicts flagged
23 unresolved — each is a case where two sources disagreed
Cohort follow-up completeness (click a cohort for detail)
Cohort A — enrolled 2023 ›96%
Cohort B — enrolled 2024 ›89%
Cohort C — enrolled 2025 ›77%

The 23 flagged conflicts are patient records where the legacy database and the follow-up tracker disagreed — surfaced for review instead of silently picking one. That's the actual value: not just merging three sources, but never letting a disagreement between them pass as settled fact.